[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a23oEo1zYdFD2nSFzvEc6SF_hoW+4OBig_SY3C1oHJA+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 14:32:31 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: Force inlining of build check to
prevent build failure
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> If gcc (e.g. 4.1.2) decides not to inline total_extension_size(), the
> build will fail with:
>
> net/built-in.o: In function `nf_conntrack_init_start':
> (.text+0x9baf6): undefined reference to `__compiletime_assert_1893'
>
> or
>
> ERROR: "__compiletime_assert_1893" [net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.ko] undefined!
>
> Fix this by forcing inlining of total_extension_size().
>
> Fixes: b3a5db109e0670d6 ("netfilter: conntrack: use u8 for extension sizes again")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
I saw this as well when I tried building with "gcc-7 -Og", and came to the same
conclusion.
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
With -Og, there were a couple of other instances of BUILD_BUG_ON() failing
to see a compile-time constant, presumably as it fails to inline any functions
that are not explicitly marked inline.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists