netdev - Re: [RFC] iproute: Add support for extended ack to rtnl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170504094356.66590a9a@xeon-e3>
Date:   Thu, 4 May 2017 09:43:56 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     dsahern@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] iproute: Add support for extended ack to rtnl_talk

On Thu, 04 May 2017 10:41:03 -0400 (EDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 08:27:35 -0600
> 
> > On 5/4/17 3:36 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:  
> >> What is the clear benefit/rationale of outsourcing this to
> >> libmnl? I always was the impression we should strive for as little
> >> dependencies as possible?  
> > 
> > +1  
> 
> Agreed, all else being equal iproute2 should be as self contained
> as possible since it is such a fundamental tool.

Sorry, the old netlink code is more difficult to understand than libmnl.
Having dependency on a library is not a problem. There already is
an alternative implementation of ip commands in busybox for those
people trying to work in small environments.