[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d20deac6-7010-c0e8-e4d8-7faa591e7306@aquantia.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 20:09:56 +0300
From: Pavel Belous <pavel.belous@...antia.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, LinoSanfilippo@....de
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, darcari@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aquantia: Fix "ethtool -S" crash when adapter down.
On 04.05.2017 19:51, David Miller wrote:
> From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
> Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 18:48:12 +0200
>
>> Hi Pavel,
>>
>> On 04.05.2017 18:33, Pavel Belous wrote:
>>> From: Pavel Belous <pavel.belous@...antia.com>
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the crash that happens when driver tries to collect statistics
>>> from already released "aq_vec" object.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 97bde5c4f909 ("net: ethernet: aquantia: Support for NIC-specific code")
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Belous <pavel.belous@...antia.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c | 3 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
>>> index cdb0299..3a32573 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
>>> @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ void aq_nic_get_stats(struct aq_nic_s *self, u64 *data)
>>> count = 0U;
>>>
>>> for (i = 0U, aq_vec = self->aq_vec[0];
>>> - self->aq_vecs > i; ++i, aq_vec = self->aq_vec[i]) {
>>> + aq_vec && self->aq_vecs > i; ++i, aq_vec = self->aq_vec[i]) {
>>> data += count;
>>> aq_vec_get_sw_stats(aq_vec, data, &count);
>>> }
>>> @@ -961,6 +961,7 @@ void aq_nic_free_hot_resources(struct aq_nic_s *self)
>>> for (i = AQ_DIMOF(self->aq_vec); i--;) {
>>> if (self->aq_vec[i])
>>> aq_vec_free(self->aq_vec[i]);
>>> + self->aq_vec[i] = NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> err_exit:;
>>>
>>
>> if the driver does not support statistics when the interface is down, would not it be clearer
>> to check if netif_running() in get_stats() instead?
>
> Yes, much cleaner.
>
> Much better would be to have a cached software copy so that statistics
> can be reported regardless of whether the device is down or not.
>
Thank you.
I will think about how to do it better.
Regards,
Pavel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists