lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170504141548.Horde.VjUEZJdTZiLesC8PBMAO8QM@gator4166.hostgator.com> Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 14:15:48 -0500 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [net-ipv4] question about arguments position Quoting Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>: > On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 14:00 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> Regarding the code comments, what about the following patch: > [] >> diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c > [] >> @@ -389,6 +389,12 @@ static int sk_diag_fill(struct sock *sk, struct >> sk_buff *skb, >> nlmsg_flags, unlh, net_admin); >> } >> >> +/* >> + * Ignore the position of the arguments req->id.idiag_dport and >> + * req->id.idiag_sport in both calls to inet_lookup() and inet6_lookup() >> + * functions, once this is a locked in behavior exposed to user space. >> + * Changing this will break things for people. >> + */ >> struct sock *inet_diag_find_one_icsk(struct net *net, >> struct inet_hashinfo *hashinfo, >> const struct inet_diag_req_v2 *req) >> > > Seems sensible. Thanks. Should I resend it in a full and proper format or it can taken from here? Thanks -- Gustavo A. R. Silva
Powered by blists - more mailing lists