[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170504000534.GA11287@gwshan>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 10:05:34 +1000
From: Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
joe@...ches.com, kubakici@...pl, f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 06/10] net/ncsi: Ethtool operation to get
NCSI hw statistics
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:18:23AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 14:47:22 +0200
>
>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 02:44:37PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>>> This adds ethtool command (ETHTOOL_GNCSISTATS) to retrieve the
>>> NCSI hardware statistics.
>>
>> Hi Gavin
>>
>> I've not been following this patchset, so maybe i'm about to ask a
>> question which has already been asked and answered.
>>
>> Why cannot use just use ethtool -S for this?
>
>Indeed, when I said to use ethtool for these NCSI hw stats I meant
>that the "ethtool -S" be used, not some new ethtool command.
>
Thanks for the comments. Feel free to ask any questions which would
make the code clear and better. There are couple of factors I thought
separate command is better than ETHTOOL_GSTATS: The statistic items from
ETHTOOL_GSTATS are variable, meaning the kernel needs provide the layout
of the statistic items via ETHTOOL_GSSET_INFO and ETHTOOL_GSTRINGS.
NCSI HW statistics aren't following this and their layout is fixed.
Besides, statistics for ETHTOOL_GSTATS are maintained in local MAC,
but NCSI HW statistics are collected from NIC on far-end. So they're
different from this point. Lastly, the NCSI software statistics needs
separate command. It'd better to have separate command for HW statistics
as well, to make things consistent.
Cheers,
Gavin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists