[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 11:10:17 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: net/smc and the RDMA core
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 07:06:56PM +0200, Ursula Braun wrote:
> We do not see that just loading the smc module causes this issue.The security
> risk starts with the first connection, that actually uses smc. This is only
> possible if an AF_SMC socket connection is created while the so-called
> pnet-table is available and offers a mapping between the used Ethernet
> interface and RoCE device. Such a mapping has to be configured by a user
> (via a netlink interface) and, thus, is a conscious decision by that user.
At a mimimum this escaltes any local root exploit to a full kernel
exploit in the presense of RDMA hardware, so I do not think you should
be so dimissive of the impact.
I recommend immediately sending a kconfig patch cc'd to stable making
SMC require CONFIG_BROKEN so that nobody inadvertantly turns it on.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists