lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 6 May 2017 22:18:16 +0530
From:   Shubham Bansal <illusionist.neo@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, ast@...com
Subject: Re: arch: arm: bpf: Converting cBPF to eBPF for arm 32 bit

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the last reply about the testing of eBPF JIT.

I have one issue though, I am not able to find what BPF_ABS and
BPF_IND instruction does exactly. It not described on this link -
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/filter.txt either.
Can you please tell me where I could find the description of these
instructions please?
Best,
Shubham Bansal


On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> On 04/06/2017 01:05 PM, Shubham Bansal wrote:
>>
>> Gentle Reminder.
>
>
> Sorry for late reply.
>
>> Anybody can tell me how to test the JIT compiler ?
>
>
> There's lib/test_bpf.c, see Documentation/networking/filter.txt +1349
> for some more information. It basically contains various test cases that
> have the purpose to test the JIT with corner cases. If you see a useful
> test missing, please send a patch for it, so all other JITs can benefit
> from this as well. For extracting disassembly from a generated test case,
> check out bpf_jit_disasm (Documentation/networking/filter.txt +486).
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists