[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170507061424.GJ22833@mtr-leonro.local>
Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 09:14:24 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
CC: "jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"jiri@...lanox.com" <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"ram.amrani@...ium.com" <ram.amrani@...ium.com>,
"sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"ogerlitz@...lanox.com" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
"dennis.dalessandro@...el.com" <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com" <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
"ariela@...lanox.com" <ariela@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC iproute2 0/8] RDMA tool
On Sat, May 06, 2017 at 02:40:24PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-05-06 at 12:40 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Thu, May 04, 2017 at 08:10:54PM CEST, Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 21:02 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > Following our discussion both in mailing list [1] and at the LPC 2016 [2],
> > > > we would like to propose this RDMA tool to be part of iproute2 package
> > > > and finally improve this situation.
> > >
> > > Although I really appreciate your work: can you clarify why you would like to
> > > add *RDMA* functionality to an *IP routing* tool? I haven't found any motivation
> > > for adding RDMA functionality to iproute2 in [1].
> >
> > Bart, please realize that iproute2 is much more than "*IP routing* tool".
> > I understand you got confused by the name. Please see sources. Your comment
> > is totally pointless...
>
> I asked for a clarification that should have been in the cover letter but that
> was missing from that cover letter. So I think that was the right thing to do
> instead of pointless. BTW, can you explain why you are using an e-mail address
> that is hiding that you are a Mellanox employee?
For the same reason as I do. It is much easier to use outside servers
than Mellanox's IT infrastructure.
Right now, I'm speaking for myself, but for me, to properly answer with @mellanox.com,
I need to use very specific mail setup, while for any other addresses I can and use any
sane setup, including mobile application.
>
> Bart.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists