lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1494233712.2562.0.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Mon, 08 May 2017 10:55:12 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/6] net: Introduce IFF_LWT_NETDEV flag


> +static inline bool netif_is_lwd(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	return !!(dev->priv_flags & IFF_LWT_NETDEV);
> +}

Am I the only one who thinks that this "LWT_NETDEV" vs "LWD" is a bit
confusing?

Is "netif_is_lwt_netdev()" really too long?

johannes

Powered by blists - more mailing lists