netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/6] net: Introduce IFF_LWT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1494233712.2562.0.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Mon, 08 May 2017 10:55:12 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/6] net: Introduce IFF_LWT_NETDEV flag


> +static inline bool netif_is_lwd(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	return !!(dev->priv_flags & IFF_LWT_NETDEV);
> +}

Am I the only one who thinks that this "LWT_NETDEV" vs "LWD" is a bit
confusing?

Is "netif_is_lwt_netdev()" really too long?

johannes