lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1494233712.2562.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 10:55:12 +0200 From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/6] net: Introduce IFF_LWT_NETDEV flag > +static inline bool netif_is_lwd(struct net_device *dev) > +{ > + return !!(dev->priv_flags & IFF_LWT_NETDEV); > +} Am I the only one who thinks that this "LWT_NETDEV" vs "LWD" is a bit confusing? Is "netif_is_lwt_netdev()" really too long? johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists