[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8bffd7a-0c2f-7815-4483-e096b56f2975@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 08:42:05 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/6] net: reducing memory footprint of
network devices
On 5/9/17 2:50 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Your initial patch tried to make those interfaces transparent, this is not the
> case anymore here. It would probably be useful to be able to filter those
> interfaces in the kernel during a dump.
The earlier email was for hidden devices; the intent there is to hide
certain devices (e.g., switch control netdevs) from user dumps by default.
Adding an attribute at create time such as IFF_INVISIBLE for such
devices would be a follow on to this set - but leveraging the same
sysctl and sysfs bypasses.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists