netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] driver: vrf: Fix one possible use-after-free issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43be9c0c-2cee-5d05-0908-53b81b4ebbba@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 May 2017 09:51:38 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     gfree.wind@....163.com, shm@...ulusnetworks.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, fw@...len.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] driver: vrf: Fix one possible use-after-free issue

On 5/9/17 3:27 AM, gfree.wind@....163.com wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> index ceda586..db88249 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> @@ -989,6 +989,7 @@ static u32 vrf_fib_table(const struct net_device *dev)
>  
>  static int vrf_rcv_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> +	kfree_skb(skb);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -998,7 +999,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *vrf_rcv_nfhook(u8 pf, unsigned int hook,
>  {
>  	struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
>  
> -	if (NF_HOOK(pf, hook, net, NULL, skb, dev, NULL, vrf_rcv_finish) < 0)
> +	if (nf_hook(pf, hook, net, NULL, skb, dev, NULL, vrf_rcv_finish) != 1)
>  		skb = NULL;    /* kfree_skb(skb) handled by nf code */
>  
>  	return skb;
> 

I'm clearly misunderstanding something ...

With the current code:
- nf_hook returns 1, NF_HOOK invokes vrf_rcv_finish as the okfn, it
returns 0, skb passes on.

- nf_hook returns 0, vrf_rcv_finish has been called by the nf_hook tree,
vrf_rcv_finish returns 0, skb passes on

- nf_hook returns < 0,  vrf_rcv_finish is not called, skb is freed by
netfilter code, vrf_rcv_nfhook returns NULL

What am I missing?

With the above, if nf_hook returns 1, vrf_rcv_finish is not called.