netdev - Re: [Patch net] ipv4: restore rt->fi for reference counting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1494370451.7796.93.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 09 May 2017 15:54:11 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ipv4: restore rt->fi for reference counting

On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 15:52 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 15:07 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Wait... if we transfer dst->dev to loopback_dev because we don't
> > > want to block unregister path, then we might have a similar problem
> > > for rt->fi too, fib_info is still referenced by dst, so these nh_dev's still
> > > hold the dev references...
> > >
> > 
> > I finally come up with the attach patch... Do you mind to give it a try?
> 
> I will, but this might be delayed by a few hours.
> 
> In the mean time, it looks like you could try adding the following to
> your .config ;)
> 
> CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH=y
> 
> 

+                               /* This should be fine, we are on unregister
+                                * path so synchronize_net() already waits for
+                                * existing readers. We have to release the
+                                * dev here because dst could still hold this
+                                * fib_info via rt->fi, we can't wait for GC.
+                                */
+                               RCU_INIT_POINTER(nexthop_nh->nh_dev, NULL);
+                               dev_put(dev);
                                dead = fi->fib_nhs;

dead = fi->fib_mhs looks wrong if you remove the break; statement ?

-                               break;
                        }