[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1494373908.7796.100.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 16:51:48 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ipv4: restore rt->fi for reference counting
On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 16:35 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> This statement is only used to ensure we pass the "dead == fi->fib_nhs"
> check right below the inner loop, it is fine to keep it without break since
> fi is not changed in the inner loop.
>
So the dead++ above wont end up with (dead > fi->fib_nhs) ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists