netdev - Re: [PATCH] wcn36xx: Close SMD channel on device removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87o9uzsidh.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 May 2017 15:11:38 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
        Eugene Krasnikov <k.eugene.e@...il.com>,
        Eyal Ilsar <c_eilsar@....qualcomm.com>,
        wcn36xx@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wcn36xx: Close SMD channel on device removal

Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> writes:

> On Wed 10 May 00:27 PDT 2017, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>
>> On 5/10/2017 1:03 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>
>> > AFAICT this never worked, as it seems I did the rework in SMD while we
>> > tried to figure out the dependency issues we had with moving to SMD. So
>> > v4.9 through v4.11 has SMD support - with this bug.
>> > 
>> > How do I proceed, do you want me to write up a fix for stable@? Do I
>> > send that out as an ordinary patch?
>> 
>> If the patch applies cleanly on branches linux-4.9.y through linux-4.11.y in
>> the stable repository you can go for '--- Option 1 ---' as described in
>> <linux-repo>/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.
>> 
>
> It does not, before v4.12 it's a completely different function to call
> to close the channel.
>
> But "Option 3" describes the situation, thanks for the reference. I'll
> try to find the time to verify the patch on v4.11 and send it to
> stable@.

Great, thanks. This seems to be that serious that better to fix this
also in older releases.

-- 
Kalle Valo