[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170511.105311.1695831326048998410.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 10:53:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: ast@...com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] bpf: Add strict alignment flag for BPF_PROG_LOAD.
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 14:53:58 +0200
> On 05/10/2017 09:09 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> @@ -3574,6 +3581,10 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union
>> bpf_attr *attr)
>> } else {
>> log_level = 0;
>> }
>> + if (attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT)
>> + strict_alignment = true;
>> + else
>> + strict_alignment = false;
>
> Just minor nit: Can we move this into struct bpf_verifier_env
> here instead of global var? The only change it would need is
> in check_ptr_alignment() to pass the env from check_mem_access().
> check_ptr_alignment() can then infer this from env.
I was just being lazy and doing it the way bpf_log is done. :-)
I've moved it into bpf_verifier_env, no problem.
> Rest looks good:
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Thanks again for review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists