| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20170511.120618.525583843526792579.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 12:06:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: daniel@...earbox.net
CC: ast@...com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/7] bpf: Adjust test_verifier for alignment changes.
Now that the verifier properly tracks pointer alignment,
many of the tests here no longer need to specify the test
flag F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
The are only two tests remaining which need it and those
intentionally try to perform unaligned accesses.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 14 +-------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 3773562..5318fbc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -3117,7 +3117,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"valid map access into an array with a variable",
@@ -3141,7 +3140,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"valid map access into an array with a signed variable",
@@ -3169,7 +3167,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid map access into an array with a constant",
@@ -3211,7 +3208,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R0 min value is outside of the array range",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid map access into an array with a variable",
@@ -3235,7 +3231,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid map access into an array with no floor check",
@@ -3262,7 +3257,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid map access into an array with a invalid max check",
@@ -3289,7 +3283,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "invalid access to map value, value_size=48 off=44 size=8",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid map access into an array with a invalid max check",
@@ -3319,7 +3312,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"multiple registers share map_lookup_elem result",
@@ -3443,7 +3435,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"constant register |= constant should keep constant type",
@@ -4396,7 +4387,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited",
.result = ACCEPT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: stack, bitwise AND + JMP, correct bounds",
@@ -4835,7 +4825,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
.result = REJECT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"invalid range check",
@@ -4867,7 +4856,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
.result = REJECT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"map in map access",
@@ -5070,7 +5058,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
reject_from_alignment = fd_prog < 0 &&
(test->flags & F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
- strstr(bpf_vlog, "Unknown alignment.");
+ strstr(bpf_vlog, "misaligned value access");
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
if (reject_from_alignment) {
printf("FAIL\nFailed due to alignment despite having efficient unaligned access: '%s'!\n",
--
2.1.2.532.g19b5d50
Powered by blists - more mailing lists