[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170511165659.GB20043@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 18:56:59 +0200
From: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>
To: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: net/smc and the RDMA core
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 06:50:04PM +0200, Ursula Braun wrote:
> Please consider the following patch to make users aware of the
> security implications through existing mechanisms.
Any such patch would be in addition to the BROKEN marker until
there is an actual alternative.
> + rmb_desc->mr_rx[SMC_SINGLE_LINK] =
> + lgr->lnk[SMC_SINGLE_LINK].roce_pd->__internal_mr;
And it's named __internal_mr for reason. The right interface to use
the unsafe rkey is to use pd->unsafe_global_rkey.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists