netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/bpf: get rid of -D__x86_64_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170512.104624.902298156565692816.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Fri, 12 May 2017 10:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     ast@...com
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests/bpf: get rid of -D__x86_64__

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 22:07:04 -0700

> On 5/11/17 6:29 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> This whole thing go me thinking however.  What do you expect to happen
>> on 32-bit architectures implementing an eBPF JIT?
> 
> I doubt any 32-bit cpu architectures will do JIT in the near future.

ARM 32-bit is being implemented as we speak, in fact it's been discussed
on this very list over the past week.