[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1494870668-65047-2-git-send-email-shannon.nelson@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 10:51:07 -0700
From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@...cle.com>,
Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] ldmvsw: unregistering netdev before disable hardware
From: Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@...cle.com>
When running LDom binding/unbinding test, kernel may panic
in ldmvsw_open(). It is more likely that because we're removing
the ldc connection before unregistering the netdev in vsw_port_remove(),
we set up a window of time where one process could be removing the
device while another trying to UP the device. This also sometimes causes
vio handshake error due to opening a device without closing it completely.
We should unregister the netdev before we disable the "hardware".
Orabug: 25980913, 25925306
Signed-off-by: Thomas Tai <thomas.tai@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sun/ldmvsw.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/ldmvsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/ldmvsw.c
index 5a90fed..309747c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/ldmvsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/ldmvsw.c
@@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ static int vsw_port_remove(struct vio_dev *vdev)
del_timer_sync(&port->vio.timer);
napi_disable(&port->napi);
+ unregister_netdev(port->dev);
list_del_rcu(&port->list);
@@ -427,7 +428,6 @@ static int vsw_port_remove(struct vio_dev *vdev)
dev_set_drvdata(&vdev->dev, NULL);
- unregister_netdev(port->dev);
free_netdev(port->dev);
}
--
1.7.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists