lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0XjehCE07iPkQM2sWG9AavZXw+T4s4YCJQ_JoF24-o1A@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 15:55:56 +0200 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Cc: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>, Kernel Build Reports Mailman List <kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org>, gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: stable/linux-4.10.y build: 203 builds: 3 failed, 200 passed, 3 errors, 5 warnings (v4.10.16) On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote: >> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 3:48 PM, kernelci.org bot <bot@...nelci.org> wrote: >> >> int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int op, >> >> This commit is not marked 'Cc: stable' upstream, but is referenced >> in the one that was backported and looks like it might be appropriate >> for stable as well. Eric, can you clarify? >> > > Hi Arnd > > Yes, it looks like stable would need this small extract from 158f323b9868, > removing the parameter from sock_edemux macro Ok, and the rest of 158f323b9868 should not go into stable, right? Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists