netdev - Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register accessors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170516.113723.631618367518477483.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 16 May 2017 11:37:23 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     johannes@...solutions.net
Cc:     sgruszka@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, helmut.schaa@...glemail.com,
        kvalo@...eaurora.org, daniel@...rotopia.org, dev@...sin.me,
        pozega.tomislav@...il.com, vasilugin@...dex.ru, roman@...em.lv,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: improve calling conventions for register
 accessors

From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:58:56 +0200

> On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 13:55 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>> 
>> In rt2x00 driver we use poor convention in other kind of registers
>> accessors like bbp, mac, eeprom. I dislike to changing only rfcsr
>> accessors and leaving others in the old way. And changing all
>> accessors would be massive and error prone change, which I'm not
>> prefer either.
> 
> That's a stupid argument, but for the sake of it - the conversion can
> easily be done with coccinelle/spatch without being "error prone".

Agreed, we have tools for this.