netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/smc: mark as BROKEN due to remote memory exposure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 May 2017 13:12:37 -0400
From:   Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     hch@....de, Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/smc: mark as BROKEN due to remote memory exposure

On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 12:41 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
> Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 12:36:01 -0400
> 
> > On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 18:30 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 12:29:23PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > I can't push back on people with silly coding style and small
> >> > semantic
> >> > issues forever.  And I think I made a serious effort to keep the
> >> > patches getting posted over and over again to make sure they got
> >> > more
> >> > exposure.
> >> 
> >> You can tell them to go to linux-rdma.  I'm sending people to the
> >> right
> >> mailing list all the time.
> > 
> > Indeed.  Every single time a patch comes into linux-rdma that
> touches
> > things in net/ or include/net, unless it is exceedingly minor, I
> check
> > the To:/Cc: lines on the email and if netdev@ isn't included, or in
> the
> > case of complex/tricky items, you aren't directly Cc:ed, then I
> > specifically tell them to include netdev@ and/or you.  I've even
> had
> > things like a 12 patch series that buried three netdev@ appropriate
> > patches at different points in the series and told the submitter to
> > move all of the netdev@ related patches to the front and submit
> them to
> > netdev@ so they can be reviewed as a group before I would move on
> to
> > the others.  It's just what you do.  I've always considered that
> part
> > of my job.
> 
> To be quite honest it wasn't exceedingly clear, even to me, that this
> had such implications or was directly a RDMA thing.  From my
> perspective while reviewing I saw a patch series adding it's own
> protocol stack living inside of it's own directory under net/

OK.  Fair enough.  That implies to me that you probably dove right into
the patches and skimmed the cover letter (http://marc.info/?l=linux-s39
0&m=148397751211964&w=2), because when I read the cover letter, it
seems pretty clear to me that this is very much RDMA related.  In any
case, there are already two other code bases that live under net/ but
also involve RDMA heavily: nfs and rds.  This is a third now.  So, for
future reference, just like the RDMA related nfs/rds patches already
get Cc:ed to linux-rdma@, these probably should be too.

> And, if even one RDMA/infiniband person said to me "you really
> shouldn't apply this" then I would have dropped it on the spot.

I'm glad to hear that.  I wish we had managed to get together on this
sooner.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
   
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD