[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170516070806.GC11965@vergenet.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 09:08:08 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [oss-drivers] [PATCH net-next 8/9] nfp: add a helper for
wrapping descriptor index
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 05:55:22PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> We have a number of places where we calculate the descriptor
> index based on a value which may have overflown. Create a
> macro for masking with the ring size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h | 3 +++
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h
> index 66319a1026bb..7b9518cbe965 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net.h
> @@ -117,6 +117,9 @@ struct nfp_eth_table_port;
> struct nfp_net;
> struct nfp_net_r_vector;
>
> +/* Convenience macro for wrapping descriptor index on ring size */
> +#define D_IDX(ring, idx) ((idx) & ((ring)->cnt - 1))
Any reason not to make this a function?
That notwithstanding:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists