[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6442bd7c-18dd-b4b8-b968-347e847b68b5@mojatatu.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 08:56:22 -0400
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, dsa@...ulusnetworks.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 04/10] net: sched: replace nprio by a bool to
make the function more readable
On 17-05-16 08:25 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, May 16, 2017 at 02:09:25PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>> On 17-05-15 04:38 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> index 88ec1a1..0e49e6e 100644
>>> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static int tc_ctl_tfilter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *n,
>>> struct tcmsg *t;
>>> u32 protocol;
>>> u32 prio;
>>> - u32 nprio;
>>> + bool prio_allocate;
>>
>> prio_allocated? (past tense seems more sensible)
>
> No, it actually tell if the prio should be allocated:
>
> if (prio_allocate)
> prio = tcf_auto_prio(tcf_chain_tp_prev(&chain_info));
>
> I believe it is accurate.
>
Your mileage may vary, this chunk:
===
if (n->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_CREATE) {
prio = TC_H_MAKE(0x80000000U, 0U);
+ prio_allocate = true;
break;
}
in which prio is used subsequently before the chunk you refer to
allocates implies the prio is already allocated.
Your call really.
I will review more later.
cheers,
jamal
cheers,
jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists