[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170517122528.GA9557@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 14:25:28 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, dsa@...ulusnetworks.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v4 06/10] net: sched: introduce helpers to work
with filter chains
Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:18:00PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>On 17-05-17 05:07 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>
>> Introduce struct tcf_chain object and set of helpers around it. Wraps up
>> insertion, deletion and search in the filter chain.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>> ---
>
>[..]
>> +
>> +static void
>> +tcf_chain_filter_chain_ptr_set(struct tcf_chain *chain,
>> + struct tcf_proto __rcu **p_filter_chain)
>> +
>
>What are the rules for this? Common coding style is:
>static void tcf_chain_filter_chain_ptr_set(struct tcf_chain *chain,
> struct tcf_proto ..
When this would not fit 80 cols (this case), you need to wrap the
text in front of the function name. That is exacly what I did.
>
>I am sure that struct tcf_proto __rcu **p_filter_chain would
>probably hit boundary of 80 chars - but it would look cleaner
>to be consistent.
>
>Otherwise:
>Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>
>cheers,
>jamal
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists