[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170517125347.GC9557@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 14:53:47 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 05/10] net: sched: move TC_H_MAJ macro call
into tcf_auto_prio
Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:47:47PM CEST, jhs@...atatu.com wrote:
>On 17-05-17 01:47 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38:08AM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>
>[..]
>> >
>> > tcf_auto_major_prio()?
>>
>> That makes no sense. prio is passed from user in upper 2 bytes (god
>> knows why but that is how it is).
>
>I am not sure it is any god's decision ;-> Unless you think the creator
>of this semantic is a god which in some circles is blasphemy ;->
>
>16 bits for prio: 16 bits for proto - what is the problem?
Should have been a struct, at least. But as you know, I always prefer
a Netlink attr :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists