[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170518155514.GA17152@tricolour.ca>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:55:14 -0400
From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...colour.ca>
To: Antony Antony <antony@...nome.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: fix state migration replay sequence numbers
On 2017-05-18 16:39, Antony Antony wrote:
> During xfrm migration replay and preplay sequence numbers are not
> copied from the previous state.
>
> Here is tcpdump output showing the problem.
> 10.0.10.46 is running vanilla kernel, IKE/IPsec responder.
> After the migration it sent wrong sequence number, reset to 1.
> The migration is from 10.0.0.52 to 10.0.0.53.
>
> IP 10.0.0.52.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0x43ef462d,seq=0x7cf), length 136
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.52.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0xca1c282d,seq=0x7cf), length 136
> IP 10.0.0.52.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0x43ef462d,seq=0x7d0), length 136
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.52.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0xca1c282d,seq=0x7d0), length 136
>
> IP 10.0.0.53.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: NONESP-encap: isakmp: child_sa inf2[I]
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.53.4500: NONESP-encap: isakmp: child_sa inf2[R]
> IP 10.0.0.53.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: NONESP-encap: isakmp: child_sa inf2[I]
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.53.4500: NONESP-encap: isakmp: child_sa inf2[R]
>
> IP 10.0.0.53.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0x43ef462d,seq=0x7d1), length 136
>
> NOTE: next sequence is wrong 0x1
>
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.53.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0xca1c282d,seq=0x1), length 136
> IP 10.0.0.53.4500 > 10.0.10.46.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0x43ef462d,seq=0x7d2), length 136
> IP 10.0.10.46.4500 > 10.0.0.53.4500: UDP-encap: ESP(spi=0xca1c282d,seq=0x2), length 136
>
> The attached patch fix it by copying replay and preplay.
>
> regards,
> -antony
>
> Antony Antony (1):
> xfrm: fix state migration replay sequence numbers
>
> net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>
> >From 1241e8b4c38ad2bf7399599165f763af38aba8d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Antony Antony <antony@...nome.org>
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 12:19:32 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] xfrm: fix state migration copy replay sequence numbers
> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...colour.ca>
>
> During xfrm migration copy replay and preplay sequence numbers
> from the previous state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony@...nome.org>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> index fc3c5aa..2e291bc 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> @@ -1383,6 +1383,8 @@ static struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_clone(struct xfrm_state *orig)
> x->curlft.add_time = orig->curlft.add_time;
> x->km.state = orig->km.state;
> x->km.seq = orig->km.seq;
> + x->replay = orig->replay;
> + x->preplay = orig->preplay;
>
> return x;
>
> --
> 2.9.3
This looks reasonable to me. With a bit more out-of-band information from
Antony and Paul Wouters we have:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4555#section-3.5
so while it is not explicit about what is to be copied, it only indicates that
the IPsec SA is to be updated with the new address whereas this implementation
creates a new IPsec SA and copies over the values, missing some.
(Note: using "git format-patch --cover-letter --cc ... -o <dir>" and "git
send-email --to ... <dir>" work really well together.)
Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...colour.ca>
slainte mhath, RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs -- ~\ -- ~\ <hpv.tricolour.ca>
<www.TriColour.ca> -- \___ o \@ @ Ride yer bike!
Ottawa, ON, CANADA -- Lo_>__M__\\/\%__\\/\%
Vote! -- <greenparty.ca>_____GTVS6#790__(*)__(*)________(*)(*)_________________
Powered by blists - more mailing lists