lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVzRKTtDE=+hBkde+zFyYOb54iKesSGbJVJ2j_-HPZ+wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 May 2017 10:52:25 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>
Cc:     Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ravb: add wake-on-lan support via magic packet

Hi Niklas,

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund@...natech.se> wrote:
> On 2017-05-16 13:36:21 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
>> > Is there some way for - e.g. the driver - to not enable WoL on Gen3 SoCs
>> > until the clock issues is sorted out? I'm quite happy to enable features
>> > where they work; not so much where they don't.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> One workaround could be to disable/enable the module clock in the WoL
>> resume path, to make sure it is enabled.  Once the enable count reaches
>> 0, CCF will know it's disabled, and will really enable next time.
>> You may need a double disable/double enable though, without testing I
>> don't know remember the enable count is 1 or 2 at that point (due to PM
>> runtime).
>
> I thought about this but it feels like such a hack I did not dare
> suggest it :-) But at the same time it would be nice to enable WoL for
> the s2idle use-case where it works. Only resume from PSCI with WoL
> enabled that is broken, and WoL in PSCI suspend will never work :-)

Indeed.

> How about I add another patch in v2 on-top of this that adds the clock
> disable/enable hack? That way it's clear that this is a workaround and
> once we have support for suspend/resume in CPG/MSSR just that patch can
> be reverted? Or is it cleaner to fold it in to this patch with a big
> comment that this is a workaround? Or is it maybe better to hold of on
> this until CPG/MSSR supports suspend/resume?

Personally, I would have no problems of having the workaround integrated (and
documented, of course) in the WoL patch, as it avoids having broken PSCI
suspend in between WoL-without-workaround and a separate workaround.

It's not that dissimilar from the initial R-Car Gen3 support patch limiting
ravb to 100 Mbps.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ