[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVzRKTtDE=+hBkde+zFyYOb54iKesSGbJVJ2j_-HPZ+wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 10:52:25 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ravb: add wake-on-lan support via magic packet
Hi Niklas,
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund@...natech.se> wrote:
> On 2017-05-16 13:36:21 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
>> > Is there some way for - e.g. the driver - to not enable WoL on Gen3 SoCs
>> > until the clock issues is sorted out? I'm quite happy to enable features
>> > where they work; not so much where they don't.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> One workaround could be to disable/enable the module clock in the WoL
>> resume path, to make sure it is enabled. Once the enable count reaches
>> 0, CCF will know it's disabled, and will really enable next time.
>> You may need a double disable/double enable though, without testing I
>> don't know remember the enable count is 1 or 2 at that point (due to PM
>> runtime).
>
> I thought about this but it feels like such a hack I did not dare
> suggest it :-) But at the same time it would be nice to enable WoL for
> the s2idle use-case where it works. Only resume from PSCI with WoL
> enabled that is broken, and WoL in PSCI suspend will never work :-)
Indeed.
> How about I add another patch in v2 on-top of this that adds the clock
> disable/enable hack? That way it's clear that this is a workaround and
> once we have support for suspend/resume in CPG/MSSR just that patch can
> be reverted? Or is it cleaner to fold it in to this patch with a big
> comment that this is a workaround? Or is it maybe better to hold of on
> this until CPG/MSSR supports suspend/resume?
Personally, I would have no problems of having the workaround integrated (and
documented, of course) in the WoL patch, as it avoids having broken PSCI
suspend in between WoL-without-workaround and a separate workaround.
It's not that dissimilar from the initial R-Car Gen3 support patch limiting
ravb to 100 Mbps.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists