lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20170518.101318.1804846322170851657.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 10:13:18 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: colin.king@...onical.com Cc: pabeni@...hat.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: make function udp_skb_dtor_locked static From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 09:50:36 +0100 > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> > > Function udp_skb_dtor_locked does not need to be in global scope > so make it static to fix sparse warning: > > net/ipv4/udp.c: warning: symbol 'udp_skb_dtor_locked' was not > declared. Should it be static? > > Fixes: 6dfb4367cd911d ("udp: keep the sk_receive_queue held when splicing") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> Applied. Please explcitily say "[PATCH net-next]" in your Subject line next time so that it is clear what tree your patch is targetting. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists