netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 5/7] net: fix documentation of struct scm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF=yD-KDtyyM=jwmQzf+kgDj-pR388DEjM4FZdTkWrs=0T5ddw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2017 11:59:23 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 5/7] net: fix documentation of struct scm_timestamping

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com> wrote:
> The scm_timestamping struct may return multiple non-zero fields, e.g.
> when both software and hardware RX timestamping is enabled, or when the
> SO_TIMESTAMP(NS) option is combined with SCM_TIMESTAMPING and a false
> software timestamp is generated in the recvmsg() call in order to always
> return a SCM_TIMESTAMP(NS) message.
>
> CC: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
> CC: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>