[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3Y7rCvmJo062-5G07HGiT6x2MtvVV=dQAVBK0AiX0U_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 08:55:21 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@...il.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@...glemail.com>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
Mathias Kresin <dev@...sin.me>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Serge Vasilugin <vasilugin@...dex.ru>,
Roman Yeryomin <roman@...em.lv>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] rt2x00: rt2x00: improve calling conventions for
register accessors
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Tom Psyborg <pozega.tomislav@...il.com> wrote:
> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' used but never defined
> static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
> ^
> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h:262:13:
> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_write' used but never defined
> static void rt2800_bbp_write(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
> ^
> CC [M]
> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800pci.o
> In file included from
> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800pci.c:43:0:
> /home/ubuntu/Music/openwrt/build_dir/target-mipsel_24kc_musl-1.1.16/linux-ramips_mt7620/compat-wireless-2016-05-12/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.h:259:11:
> warning: 'rt2800_bbp_read' declared 'static' but never defined
> [-Wunused-function]
> static u8 rt2800_bbp_read(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
> ^
On which base version did you apply my patches? There may be a conflict
against patches that are in your tree but not yet in linux-next, as I don't see
the warning and also see no reference to rt2800_bbp_read in rt2800lib.h
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists