lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170519100428.GC21003@localhost>
Date:   Fri, 19 May 2017 12:04:28 +0200
From:   Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 4/7] net: add new control message for
 incoming HW-timestamped packets

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 04:20:53PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com> wrote:
> > +SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_PKTINFO:
> > +
> > +  Enable the SCM_TIMESTAMPING_PKTINFO control message for incoming
> > +  packets with hardware timestamps. The message contains struct
> > +  scm_ts_pktinfo, which supplies the index of the real interface which
> > +  received the packet and its length at layer 2. A valid (non-zero)
> > +  interface index will be returned only if CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL is
> > +  enabled and the driver is using NAPI.
> 
> It is probably good to explicitly call out that the remaining two fields
> are reserved and undefined. To stress that applications cannot be
> overly pedantic and start failing if these become non-zero.

Ok. I'm adding "The struct contains also two other fields, but they
are reserved and undefined".

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ