[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170520064822.GM22049@secunet.com>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 08:48:22 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/9] xfrm: make xfrm_dev_register static
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:55:53AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> This function is only used in this file and should not be global.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> index 8ec8a3fcf8d4..50ec73399b48 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ bool xfrm_dev_offload_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *x)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xfrm_dev_offload_ok);
>
> -int xfrm_dev_register(struct net_device *dev)
> +static int xfrm_dev_register(struct net_device *dev)
I've applied a patch with this exact fix already to the
ipsec-next tree yesterday.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists