[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170522134300.0bfd175a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 13:43:00 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mlichvar@...hat.com,
willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
Hi Dave,
On Sun, 21 May 2017 23:14:10 -0400 (EDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 11:16:05 +1000
>
> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > net/socket.c: In function 'put_ts_pktinfo':
> > net/socket.c:695:28: error: 'SCM_TIMESTAMPING_PKTINFO' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_TIMESTAMPING_PKTINFO,
> > ^
> > Caused by commit
> >
> > aad9c8c470f2 ("net: add new control message for incoming HW-timestamped packets")
> >
> > This probably broke every architecture that has its own
> > arch/<arch>/include/uapi/asm/socket.h that does not include
> > include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h :-(
> >
> > I have used the net-next tree from next-20170519 for today.
>
> I've just pushed the following, thanks for the report:
Looks good except:
> diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> index 5147018..784b871 100644
> --- a/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> +++ b/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> @@ -97,4 +97,6 @@
>
> #define SO_COOKIE 0x4032
>
> +#define SCM_TIMESTAMPING_PKTINFO 58
Does this need to be 0x4033 (or something)?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists