[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170522.101715.189946031965146268.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 10:17:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mlichvar@...hat.com,
willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 13:43:00 +1000
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Sun, 21 May 2017 23:14:10 -0400 (EDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>>
>> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
>> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 11:16:05 +1000
>>
>> > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>> >
>> > net/socket.c: In function 'put_ts_pktinfo':
>> > net/socket.c:695:28: error: 'SCM_TIMESTAMPING_PKTINFO' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> > put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SCM_TIMESTAMPING_PKTINFO,
>> > ^
>> > Caused by commit
>> >
>> > aad9c8c470f2 ("net: add new control message for incoming HW-timestamped packets")
>> >
>> > This probably broke every architecture that has its own
>> > arch/<arch>/include/uapi/asm/socket.h that does not include
>> > include/uapi/asm-generic/socket.h :-(
>> >
>> > I have used the net-next tree from next-20170519 for today.
>>
>> I've just pushed the following, thanks for the report:
>
> Looks good except:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
>> index 5147018..784b871 100644
>> --- a/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
>> +++ b/arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
>> @@ -97,4 +97,6 @@
>>
>> #define SO_COOKIE 0x4032
>>
>> +#define SCM_TIMESTAMPING_PKTINFO 58
>
> Does this need to be 0x4033 (or something)?
Good catch, I'll fix this up!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists