[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <197333e8-b528-ef34-bd16-01e415acdf52@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 18:41:45 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] sctp: Adjust one function call together with a variable
assignment
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 18:15:12 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
Thus fix the affected source code place.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
net/sctp/protocol.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
index 057479b7bd72..be2fe3ebae78 100644
--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
@@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ static void sctp_v4_copy_addrlist(struct list_head *addrlist,
struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addr;
rcu_read_lock();
- if ((in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev)) == NULL) {
+ in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev);
+ if (!in_dev) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return;
}
--
2.13.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists