netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 17/20] net: dsa: add notifier for ageing time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87pof0boxz.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Mon, 22 May 2017 16:45:44 -0400
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 17/20] net: dsa: add notifier for ageing time

Hi Florian,

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> writes:

> On 05/19/2017 02:00 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> This patch keeps the port-wide ageing time handling code in
>> dsa_port_ageing_time, pushes the requested ageing time value in a new
>> switch fabric notification, and moves the switch-wide ageing time
>> handling code in dsa_switch_ageing_time.
>> 
>> This has the effect that now not only the switch that the target port
>> belongs to can be programmed, but all switches composing the switch
>> fabric. For the moment, keep the current behavior and ignore other
>> switches.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>
>> ---
>>  net/dsa/dsa_priv.h |  8 ++++++++
>>  net/dsa/port.c     | 37 ++++++++-----------------------------
>>  net/dsa/switch.c   | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>> index c19241eb094b..becaf8a61b13 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>> @@ -17,10 +17,18 @@
>>  #include <net/dsa.h>
>>  
>>  enum {
>> +	DSA_NOTIFIER_AGEING_TIME,
>>  	DSA_NOTIFIER_BRIDGE_JOIN,
>>  	DSA_NOTIFIER_BRIDGE_LEAVE,
>
> This is so we keep sorting notifier events alphabetically, right?

Correct. Thanks for your reviews and test!

         Vivien