[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44ba1b0c-8987-8710-a9eb-f13ad31bd966@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 17:00:59 -0400
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sctp: Adjust one function call together with a
variable assignment
On 05/22/2017 12:41 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 18:15:12 +0200
>
> The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
>
> ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
>
> Thus fix the affected source code place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> net/sctp/protocol.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> index 057479b7bd72..be2fe3ebae78 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ static void sctp_v4_copy_addrlist(struct list_head *addrlist,
> struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addr;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - if ((in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev)) == NULL) {
> + in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(dev);
> + if (!in_dev) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return;
> }
>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
-vlad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists