netdev - Re: [patch net-next RFC] net: sched: cls_api: make reclassify return all the way back to the original tp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170523051502.GA1829@nanopsycho>
Date:   Tue, 23 May 2017 07:15:02 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC] net: sched: cls_api: make reclassify return
 all the way back to the original tp

Tue, May 23, 2017 at 01:57:47AM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>
>> With the introduction of chain goto action, the reclassification would
>> cause the re-iteration of the actual chain. But it perhaps makes more
>> sense to restart the whole thing. Thoughts?
>
>I think reclassification is meant to restart the whole logic rather
>than just one chain. So your patch makes sense to me, but not
>sure if there is any corner case I miss.

Agreed. Will send v1. Thanks