[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1059621060.236992.1495568289051@email.1und1.de>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 21:38:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 17/17] net: qualcomm: add QCA7000 UART
driver
> Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de> hat am 23. Mai 2017 um 20:16 geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 23.05.2017 15:12, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void qca_uart_remove(struct serdev_device *serdev)
> > +{
> > + struct qcauart *qca = serdev_device_get_drvdata(serdev);
> > +
> > + netif_carrier_off(qca->net_dev);
> > + cancel_work_sync(&qca->tx_work);
> > + unregister_netdev(qca->net_dev);
>
> Note that it is still possible that the tx work is queued right after cancel_work_sync()
> returned and before the net device is unregistered (and thus the check for the net device
> being up at the beginning of the tx work function is passed and the function is executed).
Even if the carrier is off? Since i see this pattern in some drivers, can you please point me to a reference like a thread or something else?
> I suggest to avoid this possible race by first unregistering the netdevice and then
> calling cancel_work_sync().
What makes you sure that's safe to unregister the netdev while the tx work queue is possibly active?
> Regards,
> Lino
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists