netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: ipv4: refactor __ip_route_output_key

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9B0331B6EBBD0E4684FBFAEDA55776F93D54F8DF@HASMSX110.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 19:33:33 +0000
From:   "Rosen, Rami" <rami.rosen@...el.com>
To:     Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dsahern@...il.com" <dsahern@...il.com>,
        "nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com" <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: ipv4: refactor
 __ip_route_output_key_hash

Hi, Rupa /David Ahern,

First, thanks for this patch set!

Second, it seems to me that something might be incorrect here.

You have these additions in this patch  (1/8):
...
+struct rtable *ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu(struct net *net, struct flowi4 *flp,
+					    const struct sk_buff *skb,
+					    struct fib_result *res);
...
+struct rtable *ip_route_output_key_hash(struct net *net, struct flowi4 *fl4,
+					const struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct fib_result res;
+	struct rtable *rth;
+
+	res.tclassid	= 0;
+	res.fi		= NULL;
+	res.table	= NULL;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	rth = ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu(net, fl4, &res, mp_hash);
 	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	return rth;
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__ip_route_output_key_hash);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ip_route_output_key_hash);
 

So the third parameter to ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu() should be skb*, and the fourth parameter should be fib_result *. However, you do not pass the skb parameter 
when calling ip_route_output_key_hash_rcu() in 
ip_route_output_key_hash()  (in fact you don't use it at all),  and you pass mp_hash as the fourth parameter.

Regards,
Rami Rosen
Intel Corporation