lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 May 2017 15:36:25 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     tariqt@...lanox.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, eranbe@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
        talatb@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx4: Fix the check in attaching steering rules

From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:50:07 +0300

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
> index ae5fdc2df654..00a7cd3dcc2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
> @@ -1562,8 +1562,7 @@ static int mlx4_en_flow_replace(struct net_device *dev,
>  		qpn = priv->drop_qp.qpn;
>  	else if (cmd->fs.ring_cookie & EN_ETHTOOL_QP_ATTACH) {
>  		qpn = cmd->fs.ring_cookie & (EN_ETHTOOL_QP_ATTACH - 1);
> -		if (qpn < priv->rss_map.base_qpn ||
> -		    qpn >= priv->rss_map.base_qpn + priv->rx_ring_num) {
> +		if (!mlx4_qp_lookup(priv->mdev->dev, qpn)) {
>  			en_warn(priv, "rxnfc: QP (0x%x) doesn't exist\n", qpn);
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  		}
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/qp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/qp.c
> index 2d6abd4662b1..1eff2fe32a8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/qp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/qp.c
> @@ -384,6 +384,20 @@ static void mlx4_qp_free_icm(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int qpn)
>  		__mlx4_qp_free_icm(dev, qpn);
>  }
>  
> +struct mlx4_qp *mlx4_qp_lookup(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u32 qpn)
 ...
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mlx4_qp_lookup);
> +


This phony separation between MLX4_CORE and MLX4_EN is the only reason
you need this unreasonable symbol export.

I doubt you'll ever use this function anywhere outside of en_ethtool.c
so this export is wasted space in the kernel image.  Probably compiler
could inline it decently as well.

So find another way to do this without the symbol export.  I don't
really want to hear any stories about "clean separation" or whatever.
What's happening here is exactly why this separate modules scheme
results in ugly unreasonable code, and unnecessary gymnastics and
wasted object space just to make routines available in one place from
another.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ