netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 0/5] Various BPF fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170525.134526.1519650285082936067.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 25 May 2017 13:45:26 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        ecree@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/5] Various BPF fixes

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 01:05:04 +0200

> Follow-up to fix incorrect pruning when alignment tracking is
> in use and to properly clear regs after call to not leave stale
> data behind, also a fix that adds bpf_clone_redirect to the
> bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data helper and exposes correct map_flags
> for lpm map into fdinfo. For details, please see individual
> patches.
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>   - Reworked first patch so that env->strict_alignment is the
>     final indicator on whether we have to deal with strict
>     alignment rather than having CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
>     checks on various locations, so only checking env->strict_alignment
>     is sufficient after that. Thanks for spotting, Dave!
>   - Added patch 3 and 4.
>   - Rest as is.

Series applied, thanks Daniel.

Hmmm, this is likely to conflict with Edwards's work...