[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e72d59ca-5145-2621-56cb-325501c07a14@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 17:26:27 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net/mlx4: Fix the check in attaching steering rules
On 25/05/2017 4:07 PM, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>
> On 24/05/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
>> Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:50:07 +0300
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
>>> index ae5fdc2df654..00a7cd3dcc2e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
>>> @@ -1562,8 +1562,7 @@ static int mlx4_en_flow_replace(struct
>>> net_device *dev,
>>> qpn = priv->drop_qp.qpn;
>>> else if (cmd->fs.ring_cookie & EN_ETHTOOL_QP_ATTACH) {
>>> qpn = cmd->fs.ring_cookie & (EN_ETHTOOL_QP_ATTACH - 1);
>>> - if (qpn < priv->rss_map.base_qpn ||
>>> - qpn >= priv->rss_map.base_qpn + priv->rx_ring_num) {
>>> + if (!mlx4_qp_lookup(priv->mdev->dev, qpn)) {
>>> en_warn(priv, "rxnfc: QP (0x%x) doesn't exist\n", qpn);
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/qp.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/qp.c
>>> index 2d6abd4662b1..1eff2fe32a8b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/qp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/qp.c
>>> @@ -384,6 +384,20 @@ static void mlx4_qp_free_icm(struct mlx4_dev
>>> *dev, int qpn)
>>> __mlx4_qp_free_icm(dev, qpn);
>>> }
>>> +struct mlx4_qp *mlx4_qp_lookup(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u32 qpn)
>> ...
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mlx4_qp_lookup);
>>> +
>>
>> This phony separation between MLX4_CORE and MLX4_EN is the only reason
>> you need this unreasonable symbol export.
>>
>> I doubt you'll ever use this function anywhere outside of en_ethtool.c
>> so this export is wasted space in the kernel image. Probably compiler
>> could inline it decently as well.
>>
>> So find another way to do this without the symbol export. I don't
>> really want to hear any stories about "clean separation" or whatever.
>> What's happening here is exactly why this separate modules scheme
>> results in ugly unreasonable code, and unnecessary gymnastics and
>> wasted object space just to make routines available in one place from
>> another.
>
> I see. I'll remove this EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL and send a re-spin shortly.
> Function will still be accessible within EN driver, as mlx4_en.h
> includes qp.h.
>
Hmm, my bad, this doesn't work.
Please ignore V2.
> Regards,
> Tariq
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists