netdev - Re: [RFC] skbuff: introduce skb_put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1495781929.2572.0.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Fri, 26 May 2017 08:58:49 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] skbuff: introduce skb_put_zero()

On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 13:01 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 09:07:47 +0200
> 
> > From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> > 
> > This pattern was introduced a number of times in mac80211 just now,
> > and since it's present in a number of other places it makes sense
> > to add a little helper for it.
> > 
> > The transformations of all code were done with the following
> spatch:
[...]
> > NB: the patch won't apply to net-next because a few of the mac80211
> >     users don't exist there yet
> 
> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> 
> No objections, feel free to push this in via your mac80211 tree.

Do you think I should include the conversions in other drivers, or
would you prefer to get those as a separate patch later?

johannes