netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 08/20] randstruct: Whitelist NIU struct page overloading

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKYHVWUnLpMn4Ef9S=0hCX-hh0h_UGuV7+a_jz5v68mFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 May 2017 10:37:26 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/20] randstruct: Whitelist NIU struct page overloading

[trying again with correct linux-mm address...]

On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 01:17:12PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> The NIU ethernet driver intentionally stores a page struct pointer on
>> top of the "mapping" field. Whitelist this case:
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/niu.c: In function ‘niu_rx_pkt_ignore’:
>> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/niu.c:3402:10: note: found mismatched ssa struct pointer types: ‘struct page’ and ‘struct address_space’
>>
>>     *link = (struct page *) page->mapping;
>>     ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> The driver really needs to stop doing this anyway.  It would be good
> to send this out to linux-mm and netdev to come up with a better scheme.

Added to To. :) I couldn't understand why it was doing what it was
doing, hence the whitelist entry.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security