[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170529153131.GB7924@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 09:31:31 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Ilan Tayari <ilant@...lanox.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@....mellanox.co.il>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"jsorensen@...com" <jsorensen@...com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>,
"yi1.li@...ux.intel.com" <yi1.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [for-next 4/6] net/mlx5: FPGA, Add basic support for Innova
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 07:22:27AM +0000, Ilan Tayari wrote:
> This is neither PCI-bar mapped, nor mailbox command.
> The FPGA is indeed a bump-on-the-wire.
> (It has I2C to the CX4 chip, but that is for debug purposes, and too slow
> to perform real programming)
Wait.. So if it truely has nothing to do with the existing mellanox
driver, then nothing more than the fpga loader should be in the mlx5
directory?
> One flavor of the product, the Innova Flex, allows customer logic in the
> FPGA. But even then it is "wrapped" by Mellanox shell logic.
> We plan to have an in-kernel API for writing client drivers for Innova
> Flex.
The FPGA subsystem already has APIs for partial reconfiguration use
cases, you probably should not re-invent that under the mlx5 driver.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists