[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170530233232.GL23089@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 19:32:32 -0400
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] arp: Really delete an arp entry on "arp -d"
On (05/30/17 16:20), Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> Please don't copy/paste chunks of code. Instead refactor and make this
> into a helper function.
sure, I have no problems with that, and as I pointed out, I've not
tested ipv6 for this yet either. I'll do all of this after getting
some feedback on the more basic issue here:
I was first looking for comments on the more fundamental refcnt
management behind the fix (I'm surprised no one noticed this
before, is there some deep reason for leaving it like this, that
I am missing? Does it break something else?)
And fwiw I was merging pieces of ___neigh_lookup_noref, which figures
out the hash val, and neigh_flush_dev/neigh_forced_gc
Powered by blists - more mailing lists