lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20170530.121800.676375959648055594.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:18:00 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: tom@...bertland.com Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, gerlitz.or@...il.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...lanox.com, roid@...lanox.com, paulb@...lanox.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net/flow_dissector: add support for dissection of misc ip header fields From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 09:06:11 -0700 > The commit log does not mention cls_flower. There are no test results > given for the impact of the patch. There is no description why tos and > ttl are being added as opposed to id, flags, or IP options for that > matter. The top level merge commit explains everything, and since the patches are grouped together logically, even if you just look at the merge commit in the GIT tree, it is mentioned. This has been going on for so long, it's kinda unreasonable for you to start complaining now. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists