lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170531185205.GC11230@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 31 May 2017 20:52:05 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 0/5] dsa: add Microchip KSZ9477 DSA driver

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:47:32PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 14:28:30 -0400 (EDT)
> 
> > From: <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
> > Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:34 +0000
> > 
> >> From: Woojung Huh <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
> >> 
> >> This series of patches is for Microchip KSZ9477 DSA driver.
> >> KSZ9477 is 7 ports GigE switch with numerous advanced features.
> >> 5 ports are 10/100/1000 Mbps internal PHYs and 2 ports have
> >> Interfaces to SGMII, RGMII, MII or RMII.
> >> 
> >> This patch supports VLAN, MDB, FDB and port mirroring offloads.
> >> 
> >> Welcome reviews and comments from community.
> >> 
> >> Note: Tests are performed on internal development board.
> > 
> > Series applied, thanks.
> 
> Unfortunately, I had to revert, you didn't add MODULE_LICENSE() tags
> to the new drivers.
> 
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.o
> see include/linux/module.h for more information
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_spi.o
> see include/linux/module.h for more information

Hi Woojung

Humm, it does not mention the GPL in any of the file headers. So it is
unclear to me what license is used on these files.

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ